The scientific rap on fitness Apps

Uncategorized

Apologies for my absence, I have been incredibly busy completing all the tedious tasks associated with moving house.  Today is no different, so I’m going to be brief. Real brief.  Briefer than a bikini on Iggy Azalea’s butt!  

ia5-600x450

Speaking of butts, you may have turned to a fitness, or physical activity coaching app in order to tone you butt, biceps, or belly. But are these apps actually any good? More importantly (in my opinion), are these apps based on sound exercise science, or simply a move by a developer to make a few easy bucks?  Well, usual story, a recent study has given the answer and ladies and gentlemen it ain’t at all pretty!

The study:

The study had a look at 30 of the most popular free fitness apps on the Apple app store.  It compared the content of each of the apps to the scientific recommendations for fitness in healthy adults written by the American College of Sports Medicine [ACSM].  These science based recommendations are to the fitness professional, what the bible is to a devote Christian.

BookCover

Sadly, of the 30 apps analysed only one adhered to more than 50% of the ACSM guidelines.  Yes, only one and it’s score was 64%, which, let’s face it, is pretty bloody low.

Is it healthful?

Yes, the content of the current, most popular fitness based apps is largely garbage.  But, because using one of these apps is likely better than nothing and they do contain SOME useful content (SOME) fitness apps are slightly healthful. If I were you I’d brush up on and follow the ACSM guidelines, or find a fitness professional who can adhere to these guidelines when prescribing you your program. Seacrest out!

ryanseacrest

I hope this has been healthful. What are your thoughts? Have you tried a fitness app before? 

This unknown exercise hack may change the way you work out, science says.

Uncategorized

Is it healthful?

Occlusion training:

Occlusion training – doing weights with blown up blood pressure cuffs around your limbs – is set to blow (you) up, science says. Yes, scientific studies are analysing whether cutting off the blood flow to the muscles during resistance training may make you: (men) more ripped, rugged and ravishing; (ladies) more sexy, shaped and seductive! So, does it? Or are you looking like a dickhead – that’s Australian for idiot – in the gym for no real reason? Let us examine, scientists!

occlusion-training-artwork

Why would I even occlusion train?

Before I confirm whether you are, in fact, looking like a DH for no reason, let me answer the more pressing question: why would you EVEN occlusion train?  Great question! Well, the cuff aims to partially cut off the blood going from the heart to the muscle via the arteries and to a greater degree, blood returning form the muscles to…

View original post 1,020 more words

Do you want short, simple, scientific health tips?

Uncategorized

If you answered yes to the above question, then please follow us on Twitter or Instagram for short tips that you won’t find on the blog!

As always, I hope this has been healthful. 

Chia seeds: essential, or just for birds?

Uncategorized

“My bird eats seed, therefore, I should” (every hipster ever, 2015).  Yes, it’s a philosophy chia seed consumers live by and with the average budgerigar expected to live between 5-8 years in 2015 – that’s 199 in human years – why wouldn’t you?  Rather than take the bird’s word for it, I thought I’d have a look at the scientific data in humans? But before I do, why should you even consider consuming a seed made of chia?

Wise-Old-Bird

Why Chia seeds might be great:

Well there’s no doubting that chia seeds are a great source of various nutrients. They’re chock full of: B vitamins, fibre, protein, omega-3 fats and antioxidants among other things. This is great, but do they have any clinically significant effect on health?

The science:

To answer the above question, I have only analysed human studies from the past five years. Partly because I’m lazy and partly because older data is losing relevance.

The first study I came across was one on a group of 90 overweight women. It was found that chia seed supplementation for a 12-week period had no effect on body composition, blood pressure, cholesterol and inflammatory markers (1). Bummer.

Another study I found, reported that in a group of ten postmenopausal women chia seeds increased plasma levels of certain omega-3 fatty acids. That’s great, but this is a very small sample and does not assess whether any clinical changes have occurred (2).

A further study on a larger group (62 individuals) perhaps overcame this pitfall.  It found chia seed supplementation to enhance the same fatty acids, but unfortunately there was no change in: inflammation levels, cholesterol, triglycerides and other metabolic health risk factors (3).

Just as I was about to feed the rest of my seed to the bird, I came across one last study. This found a blended supplement of chia seeds, nopal, oats and soy protein decreased triglyceride, insulin and glucose levels in the fairly large group analysed (4). Again, this is promising – enough to hold on to the seeds at least – but it’s hard to say whether it is the Chia having the effect or one of the various other ingredients.

chia-seeds

Is it healthful?

Yes, Chia seeds are a fantastic source of various nutrients and further research may come to light in the coming months or years confirming their greatness from a health outcome perspective.  Additionally, they’re probably great, but not absolutely essential, as part of balance healthy diet. However, based on current human data – key words: current human data –  there is only limited scientific evidence that they offer any clinically proven health benefits in isolation. For this reason chia seeds are given a slightly healthful rating on this blog.

I hope this has been healthful. What do you think? Do you need the seed and is there any food (superfood) that truly offers health benefits on its own? 

Kinesiology (K) tape: krap or kritical?

Uncategorized

Is it healthful?

Over the past few years, we have seen kinesiology (K) tape bolstered to the buttocks of volleyballs players, trussed to the thighs of race horses and fixed to the faces of Youtube sensations.  K tape is proposed to lift up the skin, which is thought to enable the lymphatic system and blood to flow more smoothly underneath.  The theory sounds reasonable, but is it fact or unnecessary skin friction?

Credit: https://www.k-active.com/typo3temp/_processed_/csm_Pferdetaping_01_5d6904966f.jpg Credit: https://www.k-active.com/typo3temp/_processed_/csm_Pferdetaping_01_5d6904966f.jpg

Pain relief/rehabilitation:

Here’s the good news: K tape is better than minimal intervention – doing next to nothing.  But the good news ends there, K tape fanatics, as it is no better than other treatment approaches to musculoskeletal pain. This includes treatments like massage and joint mobilisation (1). In fact a separate, good quality study reported K taping to be no better than sham taping (putting on normal tape without tension), or normal, rigid taping (the bad looking brown…

View original post 149 more words

Should you ice after an injury? Science’s definitive answer. 

Uncategorized

Is it healthful?

Yes, it’s a question that has divided nations and torn families apart. In fact, I’m pretty sure this topic is what caused Tasmania to break itself off from the Australian mainland! Some will say: ice, ice baby; while others wouldn’t let  ice in the same room as their injury.

Pro-icers claim ice reduces inflammation, which is often excessive and disrupts joint function. Anti-icers, ironically, also believe ice will reduce inflammation, but they feel that inflammation is a natural process needed for healing. So, the question we ask science today is: to ice, or not to ice?


The science:

A review of studies looking at the effects of ice on recovery from ACL surgery, found ice reduced pain at 48-hours post-surgery, but had little long term effect on function (1). Round one, anti-icers!

Another review paper looked at icing following total knee replacement. Icing post-surgery decreased blood loss in…

View original post 227 more words

Should you quit Crossfit? The UNBIASED scientific facts!

articles, Athlete, athletes, bodybuilding, bulking, crossfit, exercise, featured, fintess, Fitness, Health, health & wellbeing, health & wellness, health and wellness, healthy, Heath, nature & science, news, paleo, Pilates, running, science, science & nature, sport, Sports, strength, strength training, training, Weight loss, weights, Wellbeing, wellness, Yoga

Should you quit Crossfit? The UNBIASED scientific facts!.

Science on high intensity interval training: HIIT, or SHIIT?

Uncategorized

Is it healthful?

Let me pose you a question: would you rather go down to the video store (if it hasn’t yet gone bankrupt) to hire a DVD, or stream it from the comfort of your own home?  You’ve probably answered: the comfort of your own home, unless of course you get all nostalgic about walking down the street to hire discs. I know I do!

Okay, okay, now let me pose you a further question: would you rather spend one hour exercising, or 30 minutes?  Stop, don’t answer that just yet. What if I were to say that both workouts would give you equivalent results? Unless you’re a time wasting enthusiast, pain junky, or DOMS devotee you’re probably going to answer 30 minutes.  Well a new (old) exercise regiment known as  high intensity interval training (HIIT) is offering just that.

Yes, if you believe one of the internet’s many great fitness prophets…

View original post 924 more words

Should you quit Crossfit? The UNBIASED scientific facts!

crossfit, exercise, Fitness, Health, wellness

Is it healthful?

The first rule of Crossfit: you always talk about Crossfit. Accordingly, it did not take me long to hear about Crossfit, and boy did it change my life! Not as a Crossfit participant, but as a health professional. You what now?!

Yes, as a physiotherapist I would often loiter out the front of Crossfit gyms as I knew I would drum up some business. And business had never been better! Deconditioned bodies being thrown into Olympic style lifting with minimal rest, heck I couldn’t have written a better recipe for injury myself.

As you can now tell, it’s exceptionally easy to poke fun at the Crossfit cult. But does Crossfit actually deserve all the flack it gets? Or is it truly an innovative, superior form of exercise? To find a definitive, unbiased answer, I have based this research on peer reviewed scientific articles, rather than those published in the unbiased-…

View original post 533 more words

Should you quit Crossfit? The UNBIASED scientific facts!

Athlete, bodybuilding, exercise, Fitness, Health, health & wellbeing, health & wellness, healthy, medicine, science, science & nature, Wellbeing, wellness

The first rule of Crossfit: you always talk about Crossfit. Accordingly, it did not take me long to hear about Crossfit, and boy did it change my life! Not as a Crossfit participant, but as a health professional. You what now?!

Yes, as a physiotherapist I would often loiter out the front of Crossfit gyms as I knew I would drum up some business. And business had never been better! Deconditioned bodies being thrown into Olympic style lifting with minimal rest, heck I couldn’t have written a better recipe for injury myself.

As you can now tell, it’s exceptionally easy to poke fun at the Crossfit cult. But does Crossfit actually deserve all the flack it gets? Or is it truly an innovative, superior form of exercise? To find a definitive, unbiased answer, I have based this research on peer reviewed scientific articles, rather than those published in the unbiased- extreme sarcasm alert – Crossfit Journal.


Injury rate:

Was business really that good? The science says maybe not. About 73% of individuals sustained an injury performing Crossfit. Yes that does sound high, but this rate of injury is comparable to that of: power lifting, Olympic lifting and gymnastics, and even lower than contact sports like rugby (1).

Surely that study was an anomaly? Nope, in a group of soldiers, half were asked to perform normal training, while another half performed high intensity functional training similar to Crossfit. Injury incidence did not differ between the two groups (2). Back to the rugby club for me!


Enjoyment and motivation: 

Another suggested benefit of Crossfit is that it motivates people unlike other forms of exercise. A study compared a group of people who started an average gym based exercise program to those who started a Crossfit exercise program. Those that performed the Crossfit program were more likely to continue exercising after completion of the study, suggesting it likely is a more motivation yielding form of exercise (3). I can’t believe what I’m reading. Crossfit is winning.

 

The physical benefits: 

Alright, alright, alright let’s not get carried away, we haven’t yet demonstrated the physical benefits of Crossfit – the most important part. So let’s have a look. Let’s have a  bloody good look!

Aerobic fitness:

A Crossfit program was shown to improve aerobic fitness and decreased body fat percentage (4). A further study mimicked these findings in a group of individuals performing high intensity interval training, like that utilised by Crossfit (5). So while you’re performing resistance exercises you are actually getting a response like you would get performing cardiovascular exercise. Not bad, Crossfit!

Strength, power and muscle mass:

Do these aerobic benefits come at the cost of: strength, power and muscle mass? Probably. While not directly proven, rest periods of 30 seconds or greater have been demonstrated repeatedly to maximise muscle hypertrophy (size), while rest periods of 3-5 minutes have been shown to maximise muscular strength and power (6). So while Crossfit will no doubt improve strength, power and muscle mass, larger rest periods would likely further these increases to levels seen in traditional resistance training programs.

Overall efficiency:

Unsurprisingly, Crossfit is quite efficient overall. When it was compared to traditional gym exercise: two cardio sessions and three gym sessions (60 minutes each), Crossfitters spent less time exercising (30 minutes per session) for fairly similar benefits (3). 

 

Is it healthful? 

Yes. I wouldn’t get your grandma to dive straight into Crossfit straight away, but with common sense and slow progression it is safe. Despite its high intensity, Crossfit may motivate you to stick with it for longer than other forms of exercise. Additionally, while you won’t get as ripped as doing well programmed weights, or as aerobically fit as a marathon runner, you will get a nice combination of both for less of your time invested.

Our verdict: I hate to say it, but moderately to very healthful! Although, you could probably perform a similar style program in a gym with professional guidance. 

I hope this has been healthful.